Free Documentaries Online

• Christopher Hitchens debates Peter Hitchens: Hitchens vs. Hitchens

  Posted by: Documentary-Log.com
  

  (27 votes, average: 2.44 out of 5)
  

   Loading ...
  

  Start Watching Christopher Hitchens debates Peter Hitchens: Hitchens vs. Hitchens

  

  This is it! Hitchens vs. Hitchens. Most are aware of Christopher Hitchens, who is an extremely influential atheist. What many might not know is that his younger brother is almost as well known and respected for being PRO Christian. Cane and Abel couldn’t have written this debate any better. This debate should be perfect for the intelligent people who visit documentary-log.com on both sides of the evolution debate.
  

  Start Watching Christopher Hitchens debates Peter Hitchens: Hitchens vs. Hitchens

  
  

  Published on July 16, 2010 · Filed under: Anthropology, Biography, From the Vault, Lifestyle, Society, Psychology, Religion;

  You may be interested in:

  1. 

     Collision: Is Christianity Good for the World?
  2. 

     Is religion good for the world? (Debate)
  3. 

     Christian The Lion
  4. 

     Hell's Angel

3 Responses to “Christopher Hitchens debates Peter Hitchens: Hitchens vs. Hitchens”

1. Rossman says:

   July 28, 2010 at 7:18 pm

   This one is a joke. While Christopher Hitchens is thought provoking and intelligent, his brother has nothing to say, and what he does say seem immature and ignorant! There has yet to be a lecture with Christopher Hitchens where someone actually can provide interesting debate.

   Reply
   • Brian says:

     October 26, 2010 at 11:33 am

     Although I haven’t watched this one, I’ve seen Hitchens against D’Souza and Wilson and both of them are clearly thoughtful and intelligent. Your reply just supports pre-suppositional apologetics. Watch the D’Souza debate and listen to the opening arguments. Most atheists completely give Hitchens a pass on his illogical argument. He claims Christianity is “immoral” that the concept of atonement is “wicked” all the while D’Souza gave evidence in history, science and philosphy why Christianity is good for the world. How can an atheist argue on moral grounds without any ground for his morality other than “human solidarity” that he always responds to that is subjective around the world? You started watching this debate with your pre-suppositions and that was the lens through which you watched the debate. Watch “Collision” with Hitchens and Wilson and see a great pre-suppositionalist at work. he gets to the heart of the matter. I respect Hitchens and enjoy watching him, reading him and laugh at many of his jokes but I get tired of so many atheists not recognizing his many illogical arguments. He sounds like a preacher in the D’Souza debate. If D’Souza would have said atheism is immoral, atheists would have laughed. But Hitchens can say that about Christianity and no one speaks up that he has no clothes on.

     Reply
2. Delphia says:

   November 4, 2011 at 4:48 am

   Abstoluely first rate and copper-bottomed, gentlemen!

   Reply