Free Documentaries Online

AT DOCUMENTARY-LOG.COM YOU CAN WATCH HUNDREDS OF THE MOST INTERESTING, POPULAR AND FULL-LENGTH DOCUMENTARIES.
NO REGISTRATION OR ANYTHING ELSE IS NEEDED! VISIT US EVERY DAY TO WATCH FREE ONLINE DOCUMENTARIES!

Documentary Updates by Email

    Sign up to get new documentaries to your Email

  • Twitter


  • Recent Comments...

    • Friends of God

      1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 3.43 out of 5)
      Loading ... Loading ...
      2671
      There is an estimated 50 to 80 million evangelical Christians residing in the United States today. They have quickly become a powerful force within the US culture and democracy. The evangelist movement is rather diverse and not always easily comprehended. Alexandra Pelosi takes viewers on a journey in this film to attempt to get a better understanding of this distinct community. Pelosi an adventurous filmmaker, meets with some evangelicals throughout the film to learn about what their influence means for our future.Originally airing in January 2007, Friends of God: A Road Trip with Alexandra Pelosi is both informative, as well as interesting. It provides us with a touching look at the diverse evangelical leaders throughout the United States. It was both written and directed by Pelosi. The film examines the relationship between the churches and political activism.

      Pelosi frequents many of the largest evangelical Christian church congregations in the US. New Life Church and Lakewood Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado are two that are explored in Friends of God: A Road Trip with Alexandra Pelosi. He also visits several other Christian organizations including but not limited to Cruisers for Christ and the Christian Wrestling Federation. The film stars, Jerry Falwell, Ron Luce, Joel Osteen, Ted Haggard and Alexandra Pelosi.

      please share:
      Published on April 19, 2009 · Filed under: Religion

      You may be interested in:

    • Minerva

      Wow, really scary how such a powerful minority can shift the U.S. from a country of religious freedom to a "Nation under God"

      *Kind of a pathetic explanation when the woman says she believes in Creationism because it is easy to teach her children. Can the whole universe really be explained in terms that a 4-year old can understand?

    • Wendy, Knoxville Tennessee

      Ugh. This is why my children attend secular private school.

    • Dave

      Just a comment in regards to the pro-life issue. I am curious to know how many so called "pro-lifers" eat animals?
      If life is life, and God created all in his image, then how come animals are so easily exploited by those that adhere to Christian values of peace and compassion?

    • Miss California

      Uh, Dave – it's because pro lifers are concerned with protecting human life because God said that killing other humans is wrong. If you'd read the bible you'd know that he is a- okay with killing animals, considering he expects animal sacrifice. Nice try though. . .

    • Dave

      Actually, I have not only read it, but *gasp* been bold enough to think for myself (I also studied under a very well respecteed eco-theologian at McGill University). And it depends entirely on your interpretation of the concept of "dominion" in Genesis 1.1-24. If you view dominion as the right to exploit animals by virtue of the fact that they have intrinsic value (human created value, obviously) to humans alone, then by all means, justify that suffering to yourself. If you view dominion as stewardship instead, then "dominion" is viewed as our responsibility to care for (look over/look after) animals, as they have been created by God (all is his image right, isn't that sacriligious to destroy what has been created by God?). Ah, nothing like education. Nice try though…

      I suggest reading more than just the bible (although it's a good read) to get information on such topics. Try Roger S. Gottlieb, Peter Singer, Tom Reagan, etc…

    • Dave

      Killing in general, is wrong. Especially when it's for nothing more than taste and tradition (it's impossible to argue that we need meat to survive, eating meat is for pleasure, nothing more, let's not kid ourselves). Anyway, that's a digression.

      I guess the next question I would pose is, if "Killing other humans is wrong" (in context with the above posted film) why isn't the Christian Right out in the streets protesting Capital Punishment as tenaciously as in the case of abortion (institutionalised murder) or the senseless killing of innocent people duirng the war in Iraq (is killing somehow ok if it serves a political function?). My point is, there seems to be a serious lack of consistency in values. If life is deemed as having inherent worth, then all life should be valued, not just human life (we are only one among thousands of species, and it's silly to be this vain about it).

      peace

    • Miss California

      I'm really impressed with your credentials, Dave. That name dropping at the end really left me in awe of your superior education. It's amazing how you have managed to break down an analysis of thousands of pages worth of self contradicting text, full of meat eating, animal sacrificing prophets to an interpretation of a single word – which, by the way is a translation of a translation of a translation.
      The word is á¼€ρχá½³τωσαν which, as I'm sure you know, is a form of á¼€ρχá½³. Having studied theology so thoroughly I'm sure you remember that á¼€ρχá½³ is the same word which God regularly uses to refer to himself. Aristotle defined it as "unmoved mover". Basically it means "first" in the most totalitarian sense- it is a far stronger word than "dominant" or "dominionship". So really it looks a lot more like God made man first on the Earth in the same way that He is first in the universe – master of life and death.

      I've no doubt that you are aware that connotation is crucial to correctly understanding Koine Greek. Given the fact that the consumption and sacrifice of animals at the time was completely normal and the belief that man was first among animals was also accepted without question, I'm sure you can see the word á¼€ρχá½³τωσαν is as far from eÍpiðtropov (that means steward in case you have forgotten) in cultural context as it gets. Given the fact that Koine Greek has about four different words for steward, I'm sure it is no accident that the author chose a word like á¼€ρχá½³ with its authoritarian connotation.

    • Hector

      I am in awe of dave's credentials, wow you studied at McGill ha? well all that tuition really did pay off. Now you can blow up words and create really complex, semi contradiction and over analyzed arguments to simple issues. Its okay though as long as it makes you feel good, you go kid. too bad you weren't smart enough for an actual Ivy league school though ,but had to settle with the pretentious. Then your argument at least could have been correct aswell..

    • Dave

      Wow, that actually kind of got out of hand. I acknowledge some of the contradictions in my own argument (which I picked up as soon as I wrote it), and in retrospect, I kinda balsted it out fast, and it may have come across as a bit pushy). That being said, I think it's fair to say, that simply because the bible said something (sorry, but the bible is only ONE version of "a" truth, not the ultimate truth, again, imn my opinion) doesn't mean it can be taken literally (surely there must be room for interpretation, afterall, ti was write a LONG time ago when circumstances were different. Also, the orginal comment wasn't meant to offend or get anything too heated, just simply that I find it contradictory that rights for dignity only extend to people, after all animals are sentient beings (they can suffer, feel pain, feel happiness…think of your pet dog when you come home, that is genuine feelings of happiness, kind of hard to deny) and I in my opinion, deserve the respect to not be made into a cheeseburger. Again, I was reacting to the whole "the bible said it", and although I feel the bible has it's place in life, it shouldn't be the end all, especially when a life hangs in the balance. I will accept the rashness of my comments, but I would beg others to reflect one their own as well, and try to consider other points of views(my first comment was a question, I didn't go after anyone). And in all honesty, it's not name dropping, Tom Reagan and Peter Simger are not everyday-type authors, that most people aren't exposed to in everyday life. I dunno, I am one for more ideas, read 'em, then make up your mind. No?
      anyway, I digress. That is all.

      peace

    • Dave

      Disclaimer: this is not name dropping

      But Sally McFague is an eco-theologian (she is a beleiver) who says that Christian texts need reinterpretation to fit our current ecological "situation". That is is what I was refering to in regards to the "stewardship vs dominion".
      Google it, might be of interest in the pursuit of different points of view on the whole "man/animal" debate.
      Also, what I would ask you guys is, let's say we go with the notion that man was created first and superior to animals, does that give us right to do what we want with all creatures? Does that imply that because we are more rational or somehow "superior", that gives us the right to do what we want with weaker or lesser beings? Do you see what I mean, it gets us stuck in a pretty ugly cycle of the more powerful smart do what they want with the weaker or less rational beings. I guess that was my point this whole time.

    • Dave

      Sorry to bust the triple comment (I have to respond to two of you!), but Hector, maybe next time add to the argument by putting forward an idea, not just a "not saying anything" semi-diss, that didn't add/contribute to any side of anything or add to anyones thinking on the topic(it's not at all a simple issue, it's clearly not, and it wasnt really my personal argument that you dont like, my "side" of it has been written about by a lot of people in the field ..remember my name dropping section? yeah..it's pretty much my take on their ideas). I get that you wanted to counter what I was saying, and that's cool, but maybe next time if you don't like what someone says, go after it with an idea to show them your point. Cause right, all I know is that you like Ivy leagues and have an affinity for "correct" arguments (I dont know what that means? an argument is a take on something, it can't really be right or wrong, althought I think I know what you mean).

    • Jamie

      crazy religous people. Wake up.

    • baldomero langbayan jr.

      this is a great documentary.i believe in creation with all my life..me and my family believe totally that almighty God created us all….

    • baldomero langbayan jr.

      it is absolutely true that christians are one the who build the foundation of the united states of america.and its time that we christians must declare that the USA is for Christ!a lot of missionaries came to the philippines to preach christ not only our place but all over asia. thank God for this christians from the USA who tirelessly preaching the gospel all over asia.GOD BLESS AMERICA!

    • CBat

      Our founding fathers (though not the colonists/pilgrims) were Deist. They held the belief that while the universe was created by a supreme being, this could be observed 100% scientifically and required no faith at all. They had no place for miracles or divine intervention within their beliefs.

      Though this doesn't debunk the idea that God created you and I and everything, I doubt you would be going to the same Sunday service as the founders of our great nation.

    • Joe

      Liberty doesn't seem to be in these people's vocabulary.

    • Joe

      Guess what the ad at the end of this video said when I watched it?

      Do you like NAUGHTY or NICE asians?
      Giggity.

    • Tyler

      As an american and a former christian, this is both enlightening and frightening. I'm tired of seeing intolerance, fear and ignorance taught in this country, and I wish these people would wake up.

      "They're so sincerely wrong that it breaks my heart."

    • Jason B

      Another proof that truth is not a democratic concept… 80 millions people basing their lives on a complete and disgusting lie… Wake up America, you're running fast into a brick wall…

    • Mr. Leon Washington

      For those of you Anti-Religious Bigots who want to marginalize people of faith I want to say one thing. You want to take away people's freedom of worship? Then MOVE to North Korea! I will buy the ticket. You do not deserve to live in a democratic society.

    • George W.

      Pathetic weepy Fag in Falwell's church at 52:21. Give me a break….

      He chose a life of taking it up the ass…no one forced it on him. Now he goes to church crying and making a scene like he is some oppressed victim….

      Propaganda!

    • ?

      Goddamn Anti-Religious Bigots, trying to restrict our freedom of ideas. we only want to worship the good loving christian way. its not like religion ever took away people's freedoms, not like we ever condemned others actions because it was against our beliefs.
      And the worst thing is those goddamn darwinists telling us God didnt create the earth, I didnt descend from no-goddamn ape, i'll take 3000 years of constantly altered sacreligious bullshit (i.e The Bible) any day over sound scientific reasoning.
      And i know when I die, jesus will be waiting for me in the clouds, along with the moisture and gales and thin atmosphere… not the ground where the most logical place to go would be!
      oh yeah and America isn't a democracy, its a facade – the people in power make the rules not you.
      and no-one can move to North Korea, its borders are closed.

    • krew

      it makes me sick the brainwashing of children…..pitting them against science with bronze age myths all because of their insecurities.

    • eli

      a very unbiased documentary.
      i enjoyed it, and yes, i am an atheist.

    • Michael in SF

      Everyone is free to hold whatever beliefs they may find most comforting. That's not the issue. The truly frightening thing is when the religious leaders, adults who need to maintain power in the structure of their evangelism, do so by brainwashing kids who simply do not have the academic, research, or intellectual backgrounds to make decisions about life, death, what is moral and immoral, etc. Essentially, they are indoctrinating children when they publish and passionately espouse (as it was already stated) bronze age myths and state without reservation that their beliefs are equal in legitimacy as sound science. That is scary.

    • Michael in SF

      Oh, and I'd like to add that whoever it was who stated that the Founding Fathers were Deists — not Christians — kudos to you. I completed my Master's thesis on that very issue. Though a few of them did in fact consider themselves Christians, the handful of the "Founding Fathers" that most people can recall off-hand (Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, etc.) were Deists in the purest sense of the word. Here's a great quote from Benjamin Franklin on that issue:

      "I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies".

      Furthermore, in his autobiography he wrote, "My parents had early given me religious impressions . . .but I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns of several points . . .in short, I soon became a thorough Deist".

      In any case, I doubt an Evangelical would believe anything I've just said, but let's hope that the voice of reason can overcome that of blind faith.

    • Fredrick johnson

      It's truly disgusting how many Americans are so willing to stop thinking for themselves and actually pay money for theocratic frauds to use
      them for power and wealth. Anyone who is willingly a member of any organised religion should be ashamed of being so spiritually and morally weak.

    • allisson

      I was born into a very strict irish catholic family. It borders on roman catholic in a way. What i was taught growing up was that i am a sinner, no matter what i do or think. I should be ashamed of my body, and any desires i want. I should live in repent. I should Understand and agknowledge i am a sinner, and humans by nature are always sinners. If you feel in your heart you truly arent a sinner, forever a sinner, then your breaking your connection to christ. If you dont confess your sins regularly you will burn in hell. I guess growing up i felt like i was this horrible shameful sinner who is a sinner by nature, and always will be. To me thats alot to put on a childs mind. While kids are struggling with ALOT these days, and i mean alot they shouldnt have to feel ashamed of thier bodies. Idk. I feel horrible saying this about my lifelong religion, and as most catholics know its not just attending service once weekly, its a very time consuming process.

    • Jack Kebek

      It's near impossible for anyone to build any amount of self-confidence in those conditions. That's one reason why I suspect many politicians, throughout all eras, believe religion is a good thing… for them.

      One reason for my own lack of self-confidence is that "apparently", I'm the result of a sin to some, and the result of a crime according to others.

      So then, I was raised under guilt imposed silence… I even feel somewhat guilty when posting, or not posting, any comment of mine.
      Briefly put, I have this gut guilt feeling I so often find myself uselessly fighting with, whatever I do… or don't do.

      No matter the cause, sin or crime (or not), I'm (finally) very happy to be alive and being able to wish you a very nice day Allisson :^)

    • Joe

      The worship of Jesus is un-American. He is a king, and the USA is a democratic republic – purposefully founded as such in rejection of the concept of the monarchy with its kings and lords. Not only is he a king, but he is a foreign national at that – an Israeli – King of the Jews.

    • DK McGreeb

      that awful song 'i am a friend of god' stating 'he calls me a friend', even for a dumbed down christian is that not a little strong of a fucking statement lol?
      its a shame these guys are growing in number, but to be fair there isnt much of real america left to be ravaged so i suppose there is consolation in the sense they wont be all to significant.
      not that im saying they shouldnt be outlawed of course, because they should. creeps.

    • DK McGreeb

      hahaha their women climax atleast once a day? if they have only very loose women within their religion (which they dont at all) thatd be a possibility i guess but i think its a more logical conclusion that theyre rapists and to them a climax is when the victim starts to cry.

    • DK McGreeb

      'hands up who heard dinosaurs lived millions of yours ago…. dear oh dear' what an unreservedly good example of an absolute cunt.

    • (just a) F R O G on the LOG

      I hate that "C" word! But I'll admit that I'm now curious to find out who you give the dubious title to, so I'll be watching this one next this evening!

    • (just a) F R O G on the LOG

      7 min. in and Haggard says "Everybody knows that evangelicals have the best sex of any group"
      That is absolutely CLASSIC !!!!
      I'm rolling….rolling I tell you….on my kitchen floor right now!!!

    • Huh?

      "Make it illegal to have a moral point of view?" Say what? I'm not religious, but I don't believe that harming a human being or animal is right…. You don't have to believe in a higher power to have morals.
      I'd like to point out that the Bible advocates rape, murder and genocide on multiple occasions, yet according to this comedian, it's judges who choose not to depend on this code of "ethics" that are immoral.
      P.S. The United States were not based on religion – the Founding Fathers hated religion. There are multiple quotations that attest to this fact.

    • SeanP

      "The clergy…believe that any portion of power confided to me [as President] will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly: for I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion." –Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 1800.

      "Experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution." — James Madison

      "As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?" — John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, Dec. 27, 1816

      The church blatantly lies about the connection of church and state. It is a modern problem purchased using votes and threats. It has to be stopped or we will condemn ourselves to the will of a few greedy unethical men instilling fear in the ignorant to reach their goals.

    • http://myspace.com/saintnarcissus keith

      Michael, thanks for that note. Is there any place I can see a copy of your Masters thesis? I have had a number of casual conversations on the whole "christian founding fathers" myth and would love to see some data such as the quotes you listed for my reference. Any thoughts would be welcome. Thanks!

    • Werrick

      I love how the acronym formed by the name of this film is FOG.

      There are a coupe of worthy points in the film. The comedian guy is right… the only people that seem to make for valid targets these days are white folks and Christians. Everything else is out of bounds. If that's going to be the standard, then fine, but the standard should be the same for everyone.

      On the other hand, think about any time you've laughed at something a comedian said. Invariably it was an observation or comment on a real-world phenomenon that we can experience to some degree. Real comedy, the funny stuff, is based in truth, at least to a small degree.

      So… why aren't there any Christian sit-coms or big, headlining Christian comedians? It's not because the big studios are bigotted, it's because, as a subject matter, fiction isn't funny. Sorry to disappoint.

    • DK McGreeb

      Werrick, i agree with your general point but sit-com tv is, generaly speaking, massively steeped in christian values, massively. Just look at things like Friends, How I Met Your Mother, 2 and a half idiots, i could go on, most of the characters are christians.
      thats because people are indeed more and more seperating themselves from christianity because it is just plain uncalled for in this day and age and tv just happens to be the best medium to re-christianise the masses. sad but true.

    • BubbaChops

      ehh, that's white MALES and Christians

    • A Growing Fear Of God

      I have a growing and already deep fear of anyone whose beliefs are absolute. You can convince this kind or person to do anything, call it God's will, and the person will do it.

      I don't think a person growing up in the cult of Kim Jong Il in North Korea and an Evangelical in the cult of Jerry Falwell in America are really that different (80 million Evangelicals in the U.S.A.?), and as the American Empire continues to crumble, I think we're going to see some pretty extreme reactions from people with some pretty extreme beliefs… if we're not seeing it happen already.

      It would appear that people are frighteningly easy to control.

      Mark in Ottawa, Canada.

    • allisson

      ANY religion that asks for alot of money, or personal sacrifice-i.e-'not allowed to talk to family who are non believers'-are false. scientology?= the fakest money oriented cult, or religion if they can even call it that?? i was involved in it, and will be the first person to tell you they are a scam. they rip out your selfesteem, degrade you, abuse you, rob you of any and all assets and then come after you if you leave. then, they use anything they have against you to bring you down. they come after your family, have their private investigators watch and record you so they wont get in trouble for their sadistic treatments. think im kidding?? suing them as we speak. good riddance to bad rubbish. scientology is a scam

    • True Friend of God(s) & Man

      Ms. Pelosi should petition her Mother (Speak Pelosi) to make this film and Trials of Ted Haggard (follow up documentary) mandatory viewing in all publicly-funded elementary and college educational institutions.

      Bible teaches beware of false prophets !

      Judgmental hypocrites too ,,,

      A True Friend of God(s) and Man.

    • dwyane shaw

      These idiots (falsely) cry about how there's no separation of church and state. But, at the sathe sme time they adamantly defend their right to be exempt from taxes. A right that only exists because of separation.

      If they want to [preach] about politics, they should loose their tax exempt status. In fact, if they want to proclaim no separation of church and state, why don't they show us they mean what they say by voluntarily giving up the exemption?

      Of course the reason, like EVERYTHING about religion, is that they want it both ways.

    • dwyane shaw

      now, lets have a look at their religious views opposing gay marriage. I am neither gay nor Christian, having no dog in the hunt, my views are merely objective observations of the facts of the matter.

      1st I might as well dismiss the favorite slogan of the pious; "God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve"..God (if you believe in Him) made Adam, Eve, and Steve -idiots

      But lets look at what the Bible actually says about marriage. In 1st Corinthians we are told "It is well for a man not to touch a woman. But BECAUSE of the temptation of IMMORALITY, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband."

      Paul goes on to say, "I say this by way of CONCESSION, not of command….if they cannot EXERCISE SELF-CONTROL, they should marry"

      "The unmarried man is anxious about the affairs of the Lord, how to please the Lord; but the married man is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided"

      So, according to the Bible, marriage is for the weak in faith, for those that cant believe enough to EXERCISE SELF-CONTROL of their IMMORALITY. God allows marriage as a CONCESSION to those of insufficient faith to overcome their [filthy lust]

      So, why don't Christians want to ban marriage all together since its merely an excuse and loophole to engage in immorality?

      Jesus said in Matthew, "I say to you that every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, MAKES HER AN ADULTERESS; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery"

      To my knowledge this is the ONLY instance in the Bible (at least in the New Testament) where it is said that one persons actions inflicts guilt onto another. One would think that would make it the most serious of offenses.

      So, if Christians were really concerned with the "sanctity of marriage", shouldnt they be clamoring for a constitutional ammendment to ban divorce? But, of course, they can't have that because it would force them to live by the standards they insist on forcing down everyone elses throats.

      HYPOCRITES!!!!!!

      Let them follow what the Bible says (without being selective in what they choose to believe) before they try to force their doctrine on others.

      Here's one they don't follow and, in fact, deride muslims for, "For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, LET HER WEAR A VEIL" (where do you think Muslims got their oppresive dogma)

      Where are all the Christian women in burka's?

      "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church"

      Now I dont advocate the subjection of women, but the Bible damn sure does. And in the case of Christian women who spout their hateful dogma -I'm all for it.

    • Robbyou

      How blindly they follow to water, those who only realize thirst after they have been told

    • …?

      This film leaves many thoughts and questions but right now I am wondering about the shameless coercion of teenagers in a rock concert style near the end of the film… this stirring up of religious passions and the very name ‘battle cry’…
      so.. its ok to indoctrinate christian teenagers in this way….?
      I’m left wondering how evangelical preachers would react to such a show to Muslim youths….?

      any thoughts?

    • Meredith

      Religious folks are lunatics.

    • Frakini

      Politics and Religion don’t mix… and that is the scary thing about this documentary and many others I have watched.
      I think its true that in the American consitition or something they say that state and religion cannot mix. they have to stay seperate. But bringing in more and more religion into the government is pushing america backwards, esspecially as it is really only evangelical christian faith, how marginalised will the population that are not evangelical christan feel and what will they have to suffer.

      Nobody is stopping your right to have faith and to practice religion but if an overly religious government comes into power then things like abortions and gay marriges will be made illegal. why should others suffer the persectution of a religious state????
      In the UK if a politician is overly religious he/she is seen as a bad candidate as they are not pursuaded by a good and just cause, they are trying to regress society to a place where we should not be. It is not good or just to deny people their rights because one faith has deemed it immoral.

      I am not religious but I believe in equality for all and if you want equality for yourself you have to behave in a way to deserve it.

      I cant even right properly it makes me so upset to see little children being brainwashed with false truths. Im very sorry if that offends any creationists but the way that these children are being taught is as if there is a scientific basis behind this theory.. which there isnt. its ok to be taught to have an open mind, its ok to even believe it but while teaching creationism they slander and make a mockery of evolution…. imagine the uproar if in scholl the teachers where refering to creationism in the same way. Evolution doesnt need to resort to silly games to prove itself or the grasping at straws the way creationism does.. for one very simple fact.. creationism is based on story and evolution is based on science.

    • Frakini

      so many spellin mistakes and stuff… I hope nobody makes any mean remarks about them,.. :-)

    • MrzDoright

      Umm… Dave, “God created all in His image” is incorrect. God created man in His image. This does not extend to animals, and therefore should not be used as an argument against killing animals. ;-)

    • Nomad

      If they are so pro life, why were they not protesting in the streets when America send young men away to kill other women , children and men in foreign countries?