Free Documentaries Online

it`s heart melting to me. It is up to us to decide the world future, TOGETHER.

This documentary tells the greatest truth of the century. It is a must see for all the Homo sapiens of today's modern world. As a citizen we are obligated to safe the nation; as Homo sapiens we are obligated to safe our home "Earth".

beautiful and profound, with an articulate call to action

On the contrary. This documentary tells the greatest lie of the century. It is a must see for all the Homo sapiens of tomorrows modern world. As to show our children mankinds arrogance of thinking we're greater than the entire planet, by believeing we'd be able to disrupt it, and that it had to be 'saved' by us…

Sorry Johannes!!! I apologize on behalf of the people who made the documentary! they made a mistake by not saying that we should sit back and do absolutely nothing and wait for Jesus to save the planet!! or are you one of those who only get out of their apartments to go to work and come back? you probably haven't seen the world and never left your city!

What I really take from this is more the fact that it is rather essential at some point in the near future to realize a powersource more readily available than Oil. Not so much for the environment but more for our own continued existence in the life style to which we have become acustome.

However, we also will in time need a new planet if we wish to continue to grow our population as we are considering this planet simply CANNOT support us. It will see us destroyed just like it does to every other species that gets over populated.

Anyone having issues with MegaVideo's limitations needs to do this:

1) Use FireFox instead of Internet Explorer
2) Install the plugin available here:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/11037

3) Enjoy the films.

I must say that, overall, I am relatively pleased with most of the comments here. The reaction it got by the idiot brigade on YouTube was positively shameful… Even by YouTube standards.

Oh sure there are those here that were somehow convinced that global warming is nothing more than a big lie spread by (Al Gore, Satan worshiping oligarchies, leftist NWO groupies, etc) for some nefarious purpose. Then again… These tend to be the same folks that believe "The Book of Genesis" is a more credible scientific reference than "On the Origin of Species".

Equally frustrating (though nowhere near as nuts) are the peeps that have taken films like "The Global Warming Swindle" as the gospel truth regardless of what the vast majority of peer-reviewed scientific data tells us. Scientific data? Hell… If you're over 35 years of age then you've probably noticed the changes yourself.

Also worthy of mention are those that seem to be hell bent on arguing over semantics. "Save the Planet" is simply a catchy slogan used to get the message across quickly and efficiently. Arguing that the planet will be fine with or without us is more than a little ridiculous under the circumstances.

After all, when we say "Save the Planet" what we obviously mean is "Save the Planet from our constant fucking up so that our species may continue to survive"… But since much of the world's population apparently has the attention span of a gnat with ADD then the pithy "Save the Planet" will have to do.

In closing let me just say that I know that English isn't the main language for many of you. For those with problems understanding the documentary due to this language barrier, the film is available free of charge in many languages (French, Arabic, Russian, etc) on the Home 2009 website.

Click my name above the film's description at the top of this page to visit their site… And spread the word by telling everyone you know to watch this incredibly important documentary.

(Note: Special mention to Umbreona Dark for understanding one of the many crucial side-points made in this movie. Bravo!)

I resent the implicatuion that being skeptical of equivocal claims makes me a creationist. Yes, the majority of scientists believe that human beings are causing climate change. 200 years ago the majority of scientists thought all the animals on earth had existed in only their present form, and only for 6000 years or so. Try looking at opposing evidence. How about the fact that the urban island effect is not PROPERLY taken into account in climate models, or the fact that every climate prediction based on global warming beliefs has been 100 percent wrong, or the fact that many of the claims in favor of global warming have recently been revealed to have been based on falsified or altered data. Environmentalists need to make money too. How do they do that? By scaring you into pouring money into their causes. I recommend you read "State of Fear" by the late Michael Crichton. It's a ficticious storyline,but all the data is real and verifiable, and it's very well presented.

Standing ovation to Casey's comment. Best analogy I've seen on this subject, no doubt.

@ Johannes

Altough I understand what you mean when you say the earth doesn't need to be "saved" you are in fact missing the point when you refute the slogan "Save the Earth", wich should be also understood like an analogy.

By using this term people are actually stating "Save Ourselves", "Let's do things in a way that will allow us to continue to live on this planet".
Because like you said, no matter what we do (or don't do), the Earth will remain here and it will keep spinning over itself and around the Sun for many years to come. On the other hand, we might not, if the conditions that allow life on earth change, we either change or we die.

I understand that the Earth has changed many times over and I'm also certain that it will continue to change. Many species were lost in this changing process and many others have changed (including ourselves).But the problem here is the rate at wich these changes occur.
And the fact that we do have a direct impact on many of the conditions that allow life to exist on the planet is irrefutable.
We are each day consuming more and more resources, each day faster and faster.
Our actions cause changes! And the pace at wich these changes occur is not the same that natural evolution can keep. If we dont open our eyes and take ponderation into our actions we'll wake up one day and have to accept the inevitability that we can't live on this planet anymore.
And that's not something I want for myself or for future generations.

When we see our oxygen supply scources being chopped down more and more each day, our ocean resources drainned more and more each year. Ice caps the size of countries melt down in less then a decade, directly affecting weather conditions, that in turn affect entire ecossistems wich end up afecting us. We can't say we dont cause impact. No other species on earth causes so much!

Sooner or later cause and effect will come and bite us in the ass (and that will be both inevitable and unpleasant).
So if we can at least try to do something to change that outcome we definetly should.

Well this is an interesting subject, one that affects and concerns all of us (or so it should).

Yes, nature is "vicious and violent and merciless and chaotic", but we're also not gentle.

And even though nature is powerfull, it's also a functional relation between all things (balance).
Even though it changes, everything in it must change with it to keep the balance, what doesn't change/adapt gets eliminated (nature is harsh, just like you said) and this is the why it will always outsurvive us as a species, we're part of "it", but "it" is so much more than us.

We humans have the power to disturb that functionallity, by for example producing waste faster than nature alone can recycle, Those disturbances affect the "balance" of things, that in turn ends up affecting us in return.

Human race has, and has proven, to have the power to disrupt the normal functionality of the worldwide ecosystem (aka nature).
I've heard an example, not long ago, that showed a relation between mass fishing and ocean floor destruction, with earthquakes and rain in the desert.
Sorry, I won't specify exactly how, because it takes too much writting space, but basically it happened because there were no more fish to recycle ocean produced natural waste, wich triggered a series of consequences that ended up produncing those effects (and those effects, in turn, will continue to generate consequences of thir own).
This comes to show how interconnected two apparently distinct factors can be in nature, and how it all resumes to cause and effect.

About human beings, I really can't believe that we produce low CO2 emissions.
Even if I consider that the studies shown to us can be bias, when I look outside my door I see, for example, everyone driving a car.
I mean, looking at my family alone, I have like 10 people owning a car (some more than one), also I have a couple more relatives that will soon take their driving licences and add up a couple more to that number.
Now I apply that principle to all the families living only on my street (and it already amounts to a big number), then if I keep applying that principle to an each time larger scale and add to that: worldwide industry emissions, waste emisions, natural CO2 emissions, and the fact that on the other end of the "chain" we're reducing by many means some of the natural processes the earth has to recycle those emission, then I don't need a study to show me we're producing too much CO2.

But even so, even if at the moment we were not producing enough CO2 to cause a significant impact on the ecosystem, the increase in that number is something we need to take in very serious consideration, because every day more and more people are consuming more and more resources and therefore generating each day more waste.

We're already poluting in a scale much larger than the ecosystem can recycle alone in our life span.
So if you keep adding to that number, the system (ecosystem), like all other systems will collapse. (I dont mean the ecosystem dying) but causing a massive change in it's structure.
In that case the earth (nature) might survive, but we might not be able to be part of it anymore.

But not to undermine your point of view, and to show you I actually understand in part what you mean to say:
Of course CO2 emissions are not the only thing to blame. Aside from the fact that the earth itself is constantly changing, the sun is also getting hotter and hotter as in 2012 we're having another solar maximum and it's already building up.

There is also a talk about how the magnetic poles will shift (not sure exactly when but it's a fact that they will), and how that might cause that for a time the earth's magnetic shield will be down, breaking down the most important defense we have against solar radiation next to the ozone layer, causing a massive increase in radiation exposure.

Yes, earth is a harsh place to live in, it has always been survival of the fittest, adapt or perish. And it'll always be.
But I say let's not make it worse for us and our children than it already is.

The point we seem be to be missing is that regardless of your perpective, whether you are creationist, evolutionist, left, right, liberal, conservative…etc, etc… Is that we need to act with and treat others with greater respect. Be humble. Treat the world around us, the community we live in, the enviroment, its inhabitants, our friends and family with the utmost respect. Understand our own failings, which we have far greater control over than the failings of others. Take responsibility for our own actions instead of blaming others.. Maybe we should shit in our own backyard! process, deal with and recycle it somehow instead of flushing it somewhere else. Then we would consider how much waste we produce. Emphasise reduction over recycling………. good forum… at least it is been discussed!

As have I Terry, but sadly I believe there are not going to be any more uploads to this site. I stumbles upon this site much to my surprise and started going through some of the comments a few days ago, I found that a user by the name, Frog In The Log happened to be the most avid user and closest to not only the original creator “Tim” but also the new owner of the site “Documentary-Log”, whoever that may be. Frog’s last post was much earlier this month I believe and the last upload from the admin was months ago. Quite sad for me because I’d been searching for a site like this for a while. It seemed to have stemmed into more than a host of embeds, but a community of viewers with like interests in knowledge and debate. I believe Frog may have created another portal much like this through YouTube but have yet to check it out.

What are some of your favorite docs that you’ve seen on this site? The Mars docs in particular have dominated much of my viewing time and I highly recommend “MARS: Dead or Alive” and “Welcome to MARS”. If you check them out make sure you watch “MARS: Dead or Alive” first as it is first in the set of the two. Also “To Mars by A-BOMB” was extremely interesting to me. It is the video I first commented on and my first post in the Recent Comments on the right.

I think I have good news for you on the number of documenteries issue. I just went through them today and there are a bunch more (really alot) than just a couple days ago. I’m going to have a veiw of the “Mars” doc next so I’ll let you know what I think. If you like things a little more on the sociology side now and then view “Hofmanns Potion”. I live in Saskatchewan where alot of it took place. This is a great one to balance the outer with the inner space. I like all genres but I’ll usually go for history if it’s close. Actually, the University of Saskatchewan (in Saskatoon, my city) was where Aldous Huxley coined the term “Psychadelic.” But you’ll have to watch the doc. It’s not about that specifically, but it covers the history of L.S.D. It’ll surprise you!