Free Documentaries Online

AT DOCUMENTARY-LOG.COM YOU CAN WATCH HUNDREDS OF THE MOST INTERESTING, POPULAR AND FULL-LENGTH DOCUMENTARIES.
NO REGISTRATION OR ANYTHING ELSE IS NEEDED! VISIT US EVERY DAY TO WATCH FREE ONLINE DOCUMENTARIES!

Documentary Updates by Email

    Sign up to get new documentaries to your Email

  • Twitter


  • Recent Comments...

    • The Mysterious Origins of Man

      1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (61 votes, average: 1.87 out of 5)
      Loading ... Loading ...
      t30372tx6g9

      The artifacts presented in this documentary seem to contradict what theories some may have about man being advanced scientifically since the beginning of human evolution, which is the predominant theory.

      The points presented in this documentary, however, isn’t a deliberate attempt to convince people or say that the earlier theories are wrong. From a scientific perspective, the counter arguments are necessary and healthy within the community. Presenting these is important to fully understand all of the assumptions and theories, in the quest for the finite truth.

      Evidences in this documentary have also been disproved, but there are some points raised here that may be hard to dispute.

      Thus, with this documentary, the origins of man and the mystery surrounding it may still be open for other assumptions and to question every theory presented, or disprove otherwise, is but a healthy manner in which scholars tackle issues.

      please share:
      Published on June 21, 2010 · Filed under: Anthropology, Biology, Environment, Nature

      You may be interested in:

    • MauiPhatz

      What is the matter with these crazy people? This is the stupidist crap i have heard in a long time. This show is great comedy.

    • Joe

      is this a joke?

    • DocMan

      its always nice to see something different. Although most will think of this as crap, if you have an open mind, this wont seem as farfetched. We have to stop thinking that everything that science today says is 100% truth because we still have so much to discover about our planet and ourselves.

    • GiveMeABreak

      What a load of crap. You can’t call this “science”. Go learn about the scientific method! I can’t watch this anymore… my brain is hurting with o much stupidity.

    • GiveMeABreak

      This is not about and open mind… this is pure crap… what a waste of hard drive space

    • dave

      DocMan,

      No scientest worth their salt belives they have all the answers. Good scientest simply follow the evidence. All of the claims made in this doc are unsubstantiated by any kind of stringent scientific methodology but rather have been refuted by the evidence that suggests otherwise.

    • Joe

      When the creationist talks about scientists having a “knowledge filter” which causes them to discard knowledge that disagrees with their preexisting opinion, it can’t help sounding like classical psychological projection. I can understand someone criticizing scientism, but scientism is not the same as science. Science is a tool, not a religion, and a real scientist knows this. The scientific method leaves little room for baseless interpretation and scientists are rigorously trained to absorb this mentality. Having evidence to support your claims and discarding disproved claims is the bedrock of science. This documentary is nonsense.

    • DocMan

      i just think that we are confined to the measurements we have. im sure in the future we will have a completely different perspective on everything. i didnt mean to insist that everything this this documentary is saying is true because frankly, a lot of it is BS, but i like that fact that there are people researching things outside the norm. without these people we don’t an alternative way of thinking. thats all i meant.

    • NoMorePlease

      It’s drivel like this that got me to throw out my TV!

    • GiveMeABreak

      “Science” is the application of a method to build a body of knowledge by means of observing of the physical world, formulating hypothesis to explain those observations, and testing how well these same hypothesis can predict future observations. If the predictions fit the observations, then the hypothesis gains more strength wrt other hypotheses ; if not it looses strength. Eventually, the strongest hypotheses becomes a Theory, which is the one that best fits the observations.

      When more precise measurement instruments because available, then the accepted Theory may need to change in order to explain the new observation.
      This is how science builds up knowledge on top of previous knowledge.

      There is a feedback loop that minimizes the error between the predictions (tests) vs the observations. This is well known by all engineers. Kalman filters make use of this same Bayesian estimation principle. (For god sake a Bayes was a priest from the 18th century!)

      All the world around us works based on these same principles. Nature is self-organizing because of that fundamental feedback loop, that spawns from the differential effects of cause and effect in dynamic systems. Science is a simple application of that same principle.

      So anyone that talks about “conspiracy” simply has no idea what they are talking about. They are completely ignorant about what the term “science” means.

      So, I would say that science is actually a “Kalman filter for knowledge” that weakens hypothesis that don’t fit the evidence.
      This doc is completely BS!

    • ABreak

      It’s important to hear different perspectives. Just watch it, and take what you want from it…thats all. If you think its complete bullshit, then don’t watch it.

      GiveMeABreak-
      You need to relax friend. You seem so angry when someone doubts something about science and then think you have to lecture them about it. Belittling someone and talking down to them is never a good way to get your point across.

      Science is our way of explaining the universe to best of our abilities using the tools we have today. A 1000 years ago we could not even imagine anything we now know is true today.This is why hearing every side of an argument is healthy and very necessary for the mind to grow and understand, even if it just doesn’t seem very likely.

    • notaportuguese

      Sounds like something a Portuguese would say.

    • xxxx

      A SHIT MOVIE D LEAST TO SAY…
      READ ABT DIS ON WIKIPEDIA

    • FrAnK

      The utter nonsense and backward reasoning in this crapumentary is sheer pollution of my brain.
      Please please PLEASE stop referring to this nonsense as being ‘science’ … it just is NOT.

      Be well.

      F.

    • Rex

      HAHAHAHA

      I’ve been looking for this for a long time, ever since my 6th grade social studies teacher should our class for basically no reason. Everyone was like ?????

    • marti

      is this an other conspiracy theory? because sure it’s not science. hominids walkings with dynosaurus!!!

    • Tiago C.

      And would you care to explain exactly, why is this something like a Portuguese would say?

    • YouFIdiots

      I think you and GiveMeABreak are total Neanderthals. First of all, other than the retarded Charlton Heston, I have no idea where the lunatics from the ‘documentary’ came from. It’s easy to say “people have banned me from the scientific community because my ideas go against modern theories”, when they are obviously not heard because they are completely mad and of lower itellectual capabillities. Is it sane to date a site because 2 stones where aligned whith the Sun on both solstices? Where is the observer? Because if he moves back and forth the angle changes. Why would the crust move with respect to the sun when ice accumulates? After all the gravity pulls to the center of the earth, and not downwards from a 3rd party view as the image wrongfully puts it. And humans with dinosaurs because the size of the footprint and de distance between it matches our average as a species??!! Also, if Tiahuanaco was built at least 12,000 years ago and the crust moved, would the rocks in the piramid still be aligned with the solstices? Anyone with the least intelligence would see this is the work of an idiot, and therefore would not even tolerate it. This is wat keeps people inmersed in stupidity.
      Regarding GiveMeABreak, what does conspiracy have to do with all the bullshit you said? Let me remind you that theories against phlogisto were considered conspiracy and nonsense, and so did non whole numbers by respected Mathematician Kronecker, the relativity theory in its birth by many in the scientific community and the Geocentric by most people in the middle ages. Even Einstein did not consider as valid the theory of quantum mechanics, so don’t preach about “So anyone that talks about “conspiracy” simply has no idea what they are talking about. They are completely ignorant about what the term “science” means”. Stop repeating and start thinking, your criticism whould be based on reason.
      Cheers!

    • GASPAR

      A Fine example for how someone can produce a shity documentary.
      First of all you hire a racist, gun enthusiast narrator.
      By using the word mystery (specially in the title) and on an issue that it is well documented, it doesnt give that much credit to the arguments. And at last, all these dudes that were presented for scientists in this film, well they reminded me more of evagelical priests than scientist that follow the scientific method.
      Supersticius ,mysterious tales for small children.
      Dangerous material for idiot people and it should be taged as science fiction.

    • jessec

      compared to the idea of a father in heaven this is pretty innocent.

    • frlone

      “Earth is at the centre of the universe” thats what most “scientists” proved with all the “scientific tools” available at that time (1500 A.D) When Galileo Galilei, an Italian physicist, said no, i think otherwise and his theory was regarded as “BS or CRAP” at least most of his life……….and would you like to know what we call him today “the Father of Modern Science.”Stephen Hawking says, “Galileo, perhaps more than any other single person, was responsible for the birth of modern science”.
      I appriciate the makers of this documentary for giving us a new point of view or a new theory especially i thank those scientists who have done that on the expense of their career…….i am very thankfull of you all.

    • awful truth

      If you want to see a documentary that is an eye opener regarding the conflict between evolution and intelligent design, check out ‘expelled, no intelligence allowed’. Evolution and intelligent design co-exist simultaneously, and the same dogma that Galileo faced from the church is now happening to astronomers, microbiologists, neurosurgeons who are losing their jobs because the evidence of intelligent design is as undesputable as is evolution. ‘Expelled’ would be a nice documentary to see on this website as a reasonable expression compared to the mysteries of the origin of man.

    • casey

      Evolution IS a closed case! That’s why virtually ALL Universities have Evolutionary Biology programs but NONE offer a PHD in intelligent design. Evolution and DNA combine to form the backbone of biological study. The evidence for evolution is embedded in everything we know about biology. Evolution is so well understood that it is more likely that sperm and egg don’t make babies than for evolution to be incorrect.

      Evolutionary theory is a theory just like Newtons theory of gravity. A FACT! If your so stupid to believe in fairy tales over science go test both theories and jump of a tall building.

    • alzimerz

      as soon as you hear the words ‘darwinism’ and ‘missing links’ you know a person does not have the capacity to understand evolution.

    • alzimerz

      that told em, fair play brother. well done from ireland

    • d

      Good. I love alternative theories. We need to keep in mind that most of what we learn are only theories. We should look at all the evidence and adjust our theories accordingly. The greatest scientific discoveries are the ones that turn the accepted knowledge upsideways. The world being flat, Earth being the center of the universe. As these theories become more solid, more people should question and try to disprove them. When we’ve ruled out ALL other possibilities, ALL possibilities, only then can we accept something as fact. If our measurements of time are accurate, and these artifacts legitimate, then we have some work to do. That’s when it’s fun.

    • Rob

      Newtons theory has now been proven unworkable on the sub atomic level. Once you think you know everything you actually know nothing at all.

      • Ash

        You’re making a spurious argument, it’s usually referred to as Trolling. That Newton and Quantum Mechanics co-exist does not mean God and Nature co-exist. And ID scientists are not being driven out of town for their convictions, they’re finding work at the Vatican and anywhere that will have them; and good luck to them.

    • Elton Robb

      I’ve watched this before.

      The pair that wrote “Forbidden Archaeology” are real scientists. They aren’t presenting a Conspiracy in science; but more like an overriding point of view that snuffs out evidence to the contrary to that point of view.

      Real Science is about studying all the evidence and testing your hypothesis. If the evidence fits your hypothesis, then the hypothesis becomes a theory. It’s not about selecting evidence that best fits your hypothesis. That’s not real science, that is more like religion in my opinion. If Science is to be independent of Religion, then it can’t be used as a Religion. Science just explains the how of the Universe, it doesn’t explain why.

      You people who say this documentary is crap should take a closer look at the evidence. What are these artifacts telling you? You can’t shut them up, you can ignore them, but eventually the story they are telling will be heard.

    • Zaius

      A better cover image for this ridiculous film would be the famous photo of Heston kissing Kira from the original Planet of the Apes.

    • dakhil

      this is not only crap but liquid crap. because hard crap (shit) is plausible. this however was done by a bunch of high school drop outs.
      im not against disproving evolution as a matter of fact id like to c it disproved but this is a lousy attempt at best.